Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean prediction accuracies across the different Bayesian ridge regression and BLUP and deep learning models for yield and agronomic traits in chile pepper using whole marker and a subset (s) of SNP loci for genomic selection

From: Ridge regression and deep learning models for genome-wide selection of complex traits in New Mexican Chile peppers

Bayesian and BLUP models

Trait1

BRR

BRR_s

GBLUP

GBLUP_s

RRBLUP

RRBLUP_s

Mean (across traits)

Mean

Mean (s)

FPD

0.77

0.77

0.77

0.77

0.77

0.77

0.77

0.77

0.77

FT

0.75

0.76

0.76

0.76

0.75

0.76

0.76

0.75

0.76

GRN

0.06

0.102

0.05

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.05

0.04

0.05

PHT

0.70

0.72

0.69

0.70

0.69

0.71

0.70

0.69

0.71

PWDTH

0.61

0.61

0.62

0.61

0.60

0.62

0.61

0.61

0.61

RED

0.31

0.33

0.29

0.30

0.31

0.29

0.31

0.30

0.31

TPW

0.68

0.69

0.71

0.71

0.74

0.72

0.71

0.71

0.71

TYP

0.33

0.32

0.31

0.32

0.29

0.31

0.31

0.31

0.32

Deep learning models

 

CNN

CNN_s

MLP

MLP_s

RF

RF_s

Mean (across traits)

Mean

Mean (s)

FPD

0.75

0.75

0.74

0.773

0.76

0.76

0.75

0.75

0.76

FT

0.75

0.76

0.76

0.76

0.75

0.75

0.76

0.75

0.76

GRN

0.02

0.03

0.05

0.05

0.04

0.07

0.04

0.04

0.05

PHT

0.72

0.72

0.73

0.73

0.72

0.72

0.72

0.72

0.72

PWDTH

0.61

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

RED

0.37

0.35

0.33

0.34

0.30

0.30

0.33

0.33

0.33

TPW

0.65

0.67

0.67

0.70

0.68

0.725

0.67

0.67

0.70

TYP

0.30

0.30

0.25

0.324

0.29

0.32

0.30

0.28

0.31

  1. 1FPD- First pod date (0.73); FT- Flowering time (0.73); GRN- Mature green yield (0.58); PHT- Plant height (0.61); PWDTH- Plant width (0.41); RED- Mature red yield (0.20); TPW- Ten pod weight (0.88); TYP- Total yield per plant (0.20). Values in parentheses are broad-sense heritability (H2) for the traits as reported by Lozada et al. [30].
  2. 2 Mean prediction accuracy significantly different with the accuracy for whole genome marker data at P < 0.05 (P = 0.045; Student t-test).
  3. 3 Mean prediction accuracy significantly different with the accuracy for whole genome marker data at P < 0. 05 (P = 0.0115; Student t-test).
  4. 4 Mean prediction accuracy significantly different with the accuracy for whole genome marker data at P < 0. 001 (P = 0.0006; Student t-test).
  5. 5 Mean prediction accuracy significantly different with the accuracy for whole genome marker data at P < 0. 05 (P = 0.009; Student t-test).